Data from eight studies on evaluating brand extensions
Eight data sets are made available by: Aaker and Keller (1990), Sunde and Brodie (1993), Alexandre-Bourhis (1994), Nijssen and Hartman (1994), Holden and Barwise (1995), and Bottomley and Doyle (1996) examining the way in which consumers evaluate brand extensions. However, because Holden and Barwise collected three sets of data, their data sets are referred to by the university where the data were collected (i.e., London Business School [LBS], ESSEC in France, and University of Illinois in the United States). The data is available in xls and SPSS formats.
Data includes: brand extention name, quality, complementary, substitute, transfer, quality extension, try, usage and researchers name.
Closely related collections to this collection (they have a parent-child relationship) are displayed in a browsable tree structure to provide contextual information for this collection and to facilitate discovery. Browse the related collections by expanding each tree node. Access a related collection of interest by clicking on the hyperlink.
Please note that only collections using the reciprocal RIF-CS relationship type "isPartOf/hasPart" are listed here. Use the Collections Connections box on the right to access all related collections.
Do We Really Know How Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations based on Secondary Analysis of Eight Studies
Field of Research
Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover.